![]() |
||||||||||
|
Other manufacturers have joined the MOI bandwagon either by copying Solheim's design or with big-headed mallet putters with extreme weighting away from the centre of gravity. MacGregor Golf produced an elongated putter, the Response ZT 615, which was used by Jack Nicklaus to win the 1986 Masters. Increasing the heel to toe length helps to stabilise a putter at impact in much the same way as a tightrope walker uses a long balancing pole. The Moment of Inertia of a putter would be irrelevant if golfers were capable of consistently contacting the ball on the putter head's sweetspot. Because they can't, the effect of off-centre hits can be minimised through design. However, whatever the manufacturers say, you can't enlarge the sweetspot - you can only enlarge the area of forgiveness. How significant this is for distance and directional control is a matter of opinion.
Frank Werner and Richard Greig in their book How Golf Clubs Really Work and How to Optimise Their Designs concluded that the scatter of hits on the face of the putter for a typical golfer, in other words hit pattern errors, have a surprisingly small effect on most putts. Far more important were errors in alignment angle and squaring the putterface to the target. So what does this all mean to you? In all probability you are more likely to miss putts for reasons other than the moment of inertia of your putter. Besides the average golfer wouldn't have a clue what the MOI of his or her putter is, or even what moment of inertia means. If you putt with a recognised make and model of putter that has been custom-fitted for you, your focus for improvement is best directed to working on the different skills of putting. A change to another putter based on its comparative MOI is probably not warranted.
Image Source |
Search This Site
|
||||||||